I will get back to your regularly scheduled programing hopefully before I have to go down to the Pepsi Center, but this is a news worthy thread.
It was rumored that the nomination vote would take place at the delegation hotels instead of on the floor at the convention. This being a, in my opinion misguided, attempt to prevent an embarrassing walk out of the more orthodox Clinton delegates on live international television. I hate it when I'm right . . .
At some point last night the rumor became policy. The Clinton delegates where notified by pages on the convention floor. The Obama delegates by and large found out as the where in line to pick up their credentials. I had this misfortune of finding out by being asked about it by a reporter. After carefully removing my foot from my mouth, I edited my sound bite to say "I think it is important as being a delegate is a representative role, that the Clinton delegates get an opportunity to cast the vote they were elected to cast." (it's okay to paraphrase yourself and call it a quote right?, I wish I had paid more attention in senior year english class . . .) but I digress, suffice to say I still think that sound bite should it get published is consistent with what I was quoted saying in
this article: .
It's very easy and frequently the problem in public life where in the heat of the moment we make decisions based on emotion that are in direct conflict with democratic principles. The irony is if we were to defer to principles these issue would not even be contentious. The principles of representative democracy in this case are unambiguous. Pledged elected delegates have been given direction by their constituents to cast a vote for a specific candidate unless specifically instructed to do otherwise. I am a dedicated supporter of Barack Obama and he will be our parties nominee, but I will not support the degradation of the democratic process for the sake of expediency.
Had we simply given the Clinton delegates a floor vote, and then allowed them to switch on the second ballot, the process would have certainly taken longer, but there is one thing not discussed. There might not have even been a need for a second ballot. Clinton at 2 p.m. will release her delegates. At that point only the most ardent would proceed to vote for her anyway in face of specific direction to do otherwise. Obama would have likely won the majority to secure the nomination on the first ballot, those who were prepared to move on could do so with out breaking their obligation to those who elected them as delegates, and those who still wanted to vote for Clinton would be given their vote. EVERYONE WOULD GET WHAT THEY WANTED.
Democracy is like a fine violin or a high performance car. It rewards competency and brutally punishes those who misuse it. Had we taken the principled route, the negative fallout would be 1. Tonight's session would last FOREVER 2. Obama's victory would be less decisive (something that everyone would have forgotten about save the people who are going to vote for him anyway, the general public does not care about internal party procedure to this detail) and 3. Tonight's session would last FOREVER! Instead we are precious few hours away from gavel down mired in a swamp of design. So here is the latest that I know:
Clinton delegates (some, not all) upset that the results of the nomination election are not going to be read are circulating a petition to demand the results be read. (Meanwhile Senator Clinton is still planning to release her delegates in 40 minutes, and is still planning to move that the nomination be unanimous) if they are not read, some Clinton delegates are planning to walk out. I tend to believe them. What I have found of this core of Clinton delegates is that they are consistent. I recently had a conversation where the result was I and the person I spoke with (and this had nothing to do with politics) decided that Consistent is not the same as As@%*$le. I have seen the Clinton delegates consistently make good on their promises, whether they where compromises of which many have been made, or if it was walking out which I have seen them do. I am inclined to believe that if a second ballot was necessary that they would have held to the promise but alas that ship has sailed, and has sunk.
We will see what happens, I am frankly nervous about this, I hope that I am wrong and simply being paranoid. I will keep you up to date as events unfold. The lesson here is, in a democracy, not matter how dire the situation, no matter how contentious the issue, when we stray from the democratic process we sign our own warrant.
And now, back to your regularly scheduled programming!
Recent Comments